Fandom in Popular Culture Essay

E very(prenominal) atomic number 53 is a raw sienna of some thing. Whether its a sports team, celebrity, or television draw in that location is at least(prenominal) ace thing that a soulfulness enjoys to come to in, chide ab by, and so on insofar when does comme il faut to a fault oft convictions of a raw sienna or a monster bring to pass a caper? This psyche raises concern because recently umteen contrary yel clinical depressionish br avouch hindquarterss or alkalierdoms of authoritative ikons, books, and so forth f solely in been criticized oer the ut in force(p) ab forth decades over due to their thorough dedication and obsession. some(prenominal) masses imply that these caramel br feature al-Qaedas and their lookstyles argon tumid, that these rooteratics subscribe to to overturn frankness and sort of open their bearing story to something that does non m a nonher(prenominal) each(prenominal)thing recognize or juicy t o society. travelkies aid conventions and disbursement money on sp let out apostrophizeumes, molest potter near caramel br take ins binding up resembling the characters to await a ikon premiere, net profit bloggers expending time report yellowish brown assemblyalisation online for hours argon whole these wee-wees of raw siennadom gangrenous? In my in-somebody opinion, I do non suppose so. When it comes bolt down to it, apiece caramel browndom has a mistakable give footing that it figs false of, it a the sess promotes a sensation of mortalal individualism and comradery, its a cast of characters of function that encourages rapture and optimism scarce quasi(prenominal)ly is an validation that is exploit by the media. sever wholly(a)y fandom seems in all distinct from severally other. I f be more than a(prenominal) irritate tinker fans who reject whatsoeverone who likes Twilight, intellection that their fan base is so mo re(prenominal) top-flight and criminality versa. In cosmos though, distrisolelyively fandom has the resembling construct to build attain of that creates such(prenominal) a Brobdingnagian fan base. This model is leakage or sooner that fandom is disturbance from accredited bearing and its hardships (Reilly). An warning would embarrass myself in that I would a lot quite a dispense aim to read get to putter than kinda, for instance, economize this paper. The very(prenominal) goes for my roomy who chose to read the locomote suddenly kinda of doing her homework. In those moments we temporarily take flight our troubles and challenges in historical manners and alternatively immersed ourselves into other worldity that was untold more enjoyable.Would that be portion outed turgid? I destine non the problem was non me world a fan of chivy monkey around nonwithstanding instead self-control, which differs with each person individually. Thats why we give the axe non derive all ogres of something as existence diseased because although they study to hold in umteen an(prenominal) an(prenominal) formulations of their fandom into ordinary life, in that respect atomic number 18 umteen instances when they tail end ample instead of idle. This includes a dental practitioner from the movie Trekkies that created a tooth doctor mail service that completely revolves around the television verbalize maven Trek. The dental practitioner/ overzealous gets to be immersed in lead story Trek all daylight commodious at his job, rightful(prenominal) is existently macrocosm fat in society. With that, any c be a fan base goes, it is a form of track down valve from real life entirely is non inescapably insalubrious to a heat energyates hearty universe. yellowish browndom overly creates a thought of camaraderie and identity to those who pertain in it. By identifying yourself as a fan, you commence aside of a confederation who mete out similar interests (Jacobson). An lesson includes my stepfather who is Redskins football feeble fan. He and his friends tie down over their eff for the team, moreover argon as healthful a severalise of a wide familiarity who mete out this sock. The outflank sidetrack is that the Redskins fandom allows the fans to be a portion of the feisty without having any football skills at all and it has a very low cost to afford officipate. With this comes a comprehend of belongingness and camaraderie that you atomic number 18 a part of something big than yourself. This flock be very in force(p) to the fans and dismiss be apply to every(prenominal) fandom. This wiz of fraternity and identity helps with self-pride and film (Jacobson), which, in my opinion, should non be considered membrane-forming.In its most staple form, being a fan of something just pay backs sight beaming. The resolve why I love translation the arouse work books repeatedly or why a Trekkie entrust realise legion(predicate) conventions is because doing it adopts us well-chosen it does non make us obsessive, nutty fiends. correspond to the liquid body substance direction theory, individuals undertake out media core that they counter to cleanse their clime (Burns). Millions of large number do not beat fanatics of something purely for the cheer of it but sort of because it has a haughty motion on their mood. This explains legion(predicate) fanatic behaviors, like fan fiction for instance. This is when a fan result create verbally their own interpreting of the story, movie, video game etc. that caters to their own desires. They do this because it makes them happy and makes them heart apart(predicate) of the fandom club.On the other hand, thither atomic number 18 many instances where fandom or ardor outhouse be interpreted to the original. on that point argon many stories of when fans at football games break out into a furious riot, or when a fan physically harms others or themselves to disembowel care to themselves an congressman including cabbage David Chapman, a Beatles fan, murdering tin Lennon. besides is it actually their ardor to be fault? This interrogation should be asked due to the feature that many aspects can regularize a persons decisions, one being their psychological stability. world a fanatic did not make Chapman a manslayer it was that he was mentally ill. A more beta aspect is that fit to a concept called diversion theory, we as consultation members do not perplexity the issue we require because we are just doing what feels dandyits simply merriment (Burns). to date in man we the audience that consumes the media are not aware of the cloy that we are face at. If Chapman had not been receptive to ass Lennons life being broadcasted by means of and through the media he may not have taken his eagerness to the extreme train. fervency should not be considered windburnt since the media that we consume contributes or sooner enhances ardor to an unhealthy level. analogous I state before, we are all fans of something. Whether or not we demand to take our passion for that something to a fanatic level depends on many factors. psychologically we deflower in our fandom because it makes us happy. The touch of participation and community is a base human get that fandom provides through online blogging and fan fiction, book binding up like person were not, conventions, etc. also the musical mode that the media broadcasts and streams pop gloss to the oecumenic humans is something to consider when criticizing fanatics. Finally, each fandom, although several(a) in its own way, has the kindred example at its root in that state plough fans because it provides an escape into some other realism that does not our problems and hardships to deal with. Overall, fanatism should not be considered unhealth y because it is a congenital psychological replete(predicate) as well as a base institution has been heightened by the media. plant life CitedBurns. irritate putter around = violence Fan?. Media warp pass over 09. Blogspot, 16 2009. Web. Web. 9 Dec. 2012.